Saxon Gold, Nov 2009

We love to hear from the readers, so here's the place to tell us what you think of the magazine.

Saxon Gold, Nov 2009

Postby Bruce Fielder » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:53 am

With respect to the article, 5 kg of gold at todays prices is worth around £112,000.

(5 kg = 11.2 lbs = 160 troy oz @ $1,160/oz = US$186,000 = £112,000. The 2.5 kg of silver is worth around £60).

Rather less than the two to three million £ quoted in the story as as the 'modern equivalent'. Comparing prices acros eras is notoriously difficult, but in terms of "hours of labour" per oz of gold, even adjusted for the 20 times more gold and 10 times more people that we have nowadays, two to three million £ seems excessive.
Bruce Fielder
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:28 am

Re: Saxon Gold, Nov 2009

Postby ravenna » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:09 pm

Not got the article in front of me as I write, but I wonder if the valuation is taking into account the craftsmanship and cultural significance rather than the bullion value?
After all, it isn't just gold, it's worked enamel, garnet, millefiori etc - admittedly teeny bits - but the value of these to the understanding of the period greatly outweighs the bullion value.
Like the tragedy of the bronze Henry Moore being nicked and melted - it was worth so much more than a few tons of metal.
User avatar
ravenna
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:25 am

Re: Saxon Gold, Nov 2009

Postby Dave Musgrove » Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:20 am

Hi. We've got a short discussion of how we come to such prices on our letters page in the January issue.
Dave Musgrove, editor BBC History Magazine
Dave Musgrove
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:38 am


Return to Talk about the magazine


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron